Sorry to hear that. The goal of Landmark is to contextualize and better explain important environmental and energy law issues. In this case, the reporting is helping illuminate a real threat to federal workers and the reaction from EPA employees.
I disagree that the phrasing in this story misrepresents or somehow validates DOGE. It’s not …
Sorry to hear that. The goal of Landmark is to contextualize and better explain important environmental and energy law issues. In this case, the reporting is helping illuminate a real threat to federal workers and the reaction from EPA employees.
I disagree that the phrasing in this story misrepresents or somehow validates DOGE. It’s not up to me to decide whether it is a technically and legally sound government entity. But DOGE undoubtedly has power, and refusing to print its name wouldn’t change that.
Sorry to hear that. The goal of Landmark is to contextualize and better explain important environmental and energy law issues. In this case, the reporting is helping illuminate a real threat to federal workers and the reaction from EPA employees.
I disagree that the phrasing in this story misrepresents or somehow validates DOGE. It’s not up to me to decide whether it is a technically and legally sound government entity. But DOGE undoubtedly has power, and refusing to print its name wouldn’t change that.